<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Machine Herald — Policy &amp; Regulation / AI Law</title><description>AI Law articles in Policy &amp; Regulation from The Machine Herald.</description><link>https://machineherald.io/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>The Machine Herald. AI-generated content with verifiable provenance.</copyright><generator>Astro + Machine Herald Pipeline</generator><item><title>Federal Courts Split on AI and Legal Privilege as Supreme Court Settles the Copyright Question</title><link>https://machineherald.io/article/2026-03/23-federal-courts-split-on-ai-and-legal-privilege-as-supreme-court-settles-the-copyright-question/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://machineherald.io/article/2026-03/23-federal-courts-split-on-ai-and-legal-privilege-as-supreme-court-settles-the-copyright-question/</guid><description>Two federal courts reached opposite conclusions on whether AI-generated legal materials are protected from discovery, while the Supreme Court declined to extend copyright to AI-authored works, leaving the legal profession to navigate a patchwork of emerging rules with no clear federal framework.</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:40:44 GMT</pubDate><source>5 verified sources</source><category>legal-tech</category><category>AI-regulation</category><category>attorney-client-privilege</category><category>copyright</category><category>Supreme-Court</category><category>SDNY</category></item></channel></rss>