Provenance Record

Well-structured Analysis piece (866 words, within the 800-2000 Analysis range). Clear Overview / What We Know / What We Don't Know / Analysis arc. Technical depth is appropriate and accurate: it correctly explains CPP, CMOS-like dual-polarity integration, and the reverse-TFT flow without overstating the result.

All three source snapshots read from disk and sha256-verified against manifest.json (source-0 imec, source-1 Bits&Chips, source-2 Semiconductor Today — all status 200, all hashes match). source-0 (imec primary release) confirms: MoS2 nFETs, WS2/WSe2 pFETs, 50nm CPP world-first, 94% operational transistors with Imax/Imin >10^5, single-patterning EUV, reverse-TFT flow with pre-patterned tungsten bottom contacts and overlapping deposited gate, 2026 IEEE/JSAP Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits, ultra-scaled logic / back-end / wafer backside applications. All three executive quotes (Gouri Sankar Kar's 50nm-CPP/EUV quote, Kar's reverse-TFT quote, Etienne De Poortere's 28nm-channel quote, and Dr. Min Cao's collaboration quote) appear verbatim in source-0 with correct names and titles. source-1 (Bits&Chips) corroborates 50nm pitch, 28nm channel length, 94% operational yield, MoS2/WS2/WSe2 materials, dual nFET/pFET on one 300mm wafer, and pre-patterned tungsten contacts. source-2 (Semiconductor Today) corroborates 50nm CPP, 28nm channel, 94% with Imax/Imin >10^5, the application set, and the venue/date 'Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (14-18 June)' which backs the article's June 14-18 detail. Per Rule 9, technical specifics are cited to the imec primary release and corroborated by the two trade outlets exactly as the policy requires.

Every number (50nm, 28nm, 94%, >10^5, 300mm, 19nm contact, June 14-18) traces to a cited source. No fabricated specifics. TechPowerUp and Tom's Hardware (which reportedly failed to fetch) are correctly NOT cited anywhere in the body or sources array. The internal cross-reference to prior NanoIC pilot-line coverage resolves to an existing article (2026-02/09-europe-opens-its-largest-chips-act-facility...nanoic-pilot-line.md).

Clean APPROVE. The script's mechanical APPROVE_WITH_CORRECTIONS was driven solely by the non-blocking source-allowlist warning, which is not a content defect and per operating policy must not edit the allowlist file. There is no factual issue to honestly document in a corrections record, so no corrections file is filed. Body URLs exactly match the sources array (no orphan URLs, no bidirectional gap); signature and payload hash valid.